| Dear
Friends and Colleagues,
At the
Cancer Survivor Center, we are often asked about commercial
products that make claims to cure and/or treat chronic health
conditions and we wanted to take this forum to explain our
position about so-called "super foods".
I am
specifically talking about the "superfruit" drinks
that contain high levels of anti-oxidants and others (proprietary
blends) that claim to be miraculous in curing a host of chronic
ailments. There is no question that the reductionism ideology
of nutritional science has been able to isolate a number of
chemicals that work well in experiments to scavenge free radicals.
HOWEVER, claims made by many of the companies selling these
products (Noni, Vibe, Mangosteen, Mono Vie, Grape fruit diet
among a host of others---we are not targeting any specific
company) is based on sketchy clinical science (we encourage
you to review their science directly as we have done). Vitamin
C, E and beta-carotene among many other antioxidants are in
these products (it is often difficult to determine the actual
amounts because their products are of a proprietary blend)
so juices with these constituents can be marketed as a potentially
healthy drink that MAY reduce the chance of getting a chronic
disease. The fruit juice may actually even do that.....but
we really don't know if a commercially prepared (processed)
fruit delivers the same nutrient and protective effect as
simply eating the un-processed fruit itself.
FDA
Regulation of Health Claims
Federal
law allows for certain claims to be made in the labeling of
food and supplements. These include claims approved by the
Food and Drug Administration that show a strong link, based
on scientific evidence, between a food substance and a disease
or health condition. These approved claims can state only
that a food substance reduces the risk of certain health problems
- not that it can treat or cure a disease. Two examples of
approved claims are: "The vitamin folic acid may reduce
the risk of neural tube defect-affected pregnancies,"
and "Calcium may reduce the risk of the bone disease
osteoporosis."
Dietary
supplements also may carry claims in their labeling that describe
the effect of a substance in maintaining the body's normal
structure or function, as long as the claims don't imply the
product treats or cures a disease. The FDA does not review
or authorize these claims. An example of such a claim is,
"Product B promotes healthy joints and bones." When
a dietary supplement is promoted with a claim like this, the
claim must be accompanied with the disclaimer, "This
statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent
disease."
To learn
more about the kinds of labeling claims that can be made for
foods and dietary supplements, see www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/hclaims.html.
Superfruit
juices all build their claims about their product on the same
central idea. They contain large amounts of antioxidants,
which fight the free radicals that cause aging and/or contribute
to disease.
Free
radicals are complicated. The 25¢ definition is a molecule
with an unpaired electron that allows it to easily form a
covalent bond with one of your good molecules, thus oxidizing
it. This is one way that cells can be attacked, and this effect
can and does lead to a number of age-related diseases. At
first glance, this makes the role of antioxidants obvious.
Eliminate those oxidizing molecules, and help prevent age-related
diseases. Right? Not so fast. Human biochemistry is not as
simple as the linguistic dichotomy of oxidation vs. antioxidant.
It's extraordinarily complex. The oxidation from free radicals
also has important benefits to the body: Converting fat into
energy and attacking bacteria, just for a start.
Dr. Stephen
Barrett sums it up quite aptly in an article about antioxidants
(which also lists this and many other clinical trials if you
want to see for yourself):
"There
is widespread scientific agreement that eating adequate amounts
of fruits and vegetables can help lower the incidence of cardiovascular
disease and certain cancers. With respect to antioxidants
and other phytochemicals, the key question is whether supplementation
has been proven to do more good than harm. So far, the answer
is no, which is why the FDA will not permit any of these substances
to be labeled or marketed with claims that they can prevent
disease."
Choice,
the publication of the Australian Consumers Association, undertook
a major study to answer this question in 2007. They bought
virtually every superfruit juice that's commercially available.
In their labs, they tested all of them for their total antioxidant
capacity using the oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay
test, laying out their methodology in detail — which
you'll notice the promoters of these products never do.
As a
baseline, Choice measured the total antioxidant capacity,
or TAC, of a common apple — a Red Delicious Apple, to
be precise — and got a reading of 5900. This number
was then compared to the TAC measured from a daily serving
of each superfruit juice.
- The
first type of superfruit juice tested was goji, a berry
from Asia also known as the wolfberry. Servings of four
different goji-based superfruit juices were found to have
TAC measurements ranging from 570 to 2,025 for a product
that is a 100% purée of the berry, in other words,
from 10% to 34% the TAC of a common apple.
- Next,
they tested two brands of mangosteen superfruit juices.
Mangosteen is claimed to have double the antioxidant capacity
of goji. The results? Two two juices came in at 1,020 and
1,710, or 17% and 29% of the TAC of a common apple.
- Next,
they tested two brands of noni superfruit juices. Noni comes
from Polynesia, and is frequently used in Hawaiian traditional
medicine. The two brands measured 540 and 525, each about
9% the TAC of a common apple. In other words, a $7 cup of
noni juice contains as much antioxidants as a thin 5¢
slice of apple.
- Finally,
Choice put açai to the test. The açai is a
small purple berry from the Amazon, and Oprah calls it the
"#1 food for anti-aging." Açai is the headliner
ingredient in MonaVie, but since they do not disclose their
formula, the percentage is unknown. Choice tested a similar
product from RioLife containing 14% açai pulp. It
measured almost as well as the best goji juice, with a TAC
of 1,800, or about 31% as much as a common apple.
Choice
also added several more common fruits to the mix. A single
navel orange was found to have a TAC of 2,540. A cup of strawberries
has 5,938. A cup of raspberries has a TAC of 6,058. And the
overall winner was a cup of cultivated blueberries, with a
total antioxidant capacity of 9,019.
But how
can this be? Choice magazine found that the marketing literature
says that goji berries have ten times, and açai berries
six times, the antioxidant capacity of blueberries. Well,
this might well be true. The difference is due to the fact
that you're drinking a juice made from the fruit, you're not
eating the whole fruit itself. For example, the mangosteen
fruit has a huge amount of antioxidants and other nutrients.
However, it's all contained within the inedible rind. The
edible pulp of the fruit has only a negligible amount of either.
This is how it's possible for the marketing claim to be, well,
accurate if misleading; but the product itself to be devoid
of the claimed benefits.
Superfruit
juices may be good sources of antioxidants compared to, say,
spaghetti or a cheeseburger; but if you want antioxidants,
you'll get far more of them for about 1/100th the price by
simply eating common fruit from the supermarket.
Commercially
available superfruit juices may be good for you but at $200/month
that is a lot of money for something you can simply walk down
to the supermarket and buy for a lot less money.
Our position
is clear. A diet high in fruits and vegetables and whole grains
while reducing animal products (meat) and overall fat is the
best and most effective way to prevent disease and stay healthy.
We look
forward to your comments.
Riggs
Klika
Resources
Faster
Tumor Growth Rate Proof Younger Women Need Yearly Mammograms
Norwegian
researchers have used screening data from 395,188 women
taking part in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program
to determine tumor growth rates by age. Of those between
50 and 69 years old, the younger women were seen to have
the fastest growing tumors, offering reason for mammograms
at an earlier age.
Skin
Cancer Facts – What You Need to Know
How can you reduce your risk? When should you see a doctor?
Learn about the early signs and symptoms of skin cancer.
“Chemo-Brain”
in the News Battling memory loss? Struggling
to remember where you put your keys? Can’t retrieve
common words? These may all be related to your chemotherapy
treatment. An increased number of researchers are looking
into the causes, symptoms, and “cures” for chemo-brain.
|